Korjobs.com

Sign In

HR Disciplines

U.S. offers tips on avoiding overtime pay

HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 20:14 Views : 639

U.S. offers tips on avoiding overtime pay

New labor rules expected to take effect early this year

updated 1/5/2004 6:33:40 PM ET 2004-01-05T23:33:40
    The Labor Department is giving employers tips on how to avoid paying overtime to some of the 1.3 million low-income workers who would become eligible under new rules expected to be finalized early this year.

The department's advice comes even as it touts the $895 million in increased wages that it says those workers would be guaranteed from the reforms.

Among the options for employers: cut workers' hourly wages and add the overtime to equal the original salary, or raise salaries to the new $22,100 annual threshold, making them ineligible.

The department says it is merely listing well-known choices available to employers, even under current law.

"We're not saying anybody should do any of this," said Labor Department spokesman Ed Frank.

New overtime regulations were proposed in March after employers complained they were being saddled with costly lawsuits filed by workers who claimed they were unfairly being denied overtime. But the regulations themselves have stirred controversy over how many workers would be stripped of their right to overtime pay.

The issue is being seized by Democrats in their attempt to win back Congress and the White House.

 
A final rule, revising the 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act, is expected to be issued in March. The act defines the types of jobs that qualify workers for time-and-a-half if they work more than 40 hours a week.

Overtime pay for the 1.3 million low-income workers has been a selling tool for the Bush administration in trying to ease concerns in Congress about millions of higher-paid workers becoming ineligible.

But the Labor Department, in a summary of its plan published last March, suggests how employers can avoid paying overtime to those newly eligible low-income workers.

"Most employers affected by the proposed rule would be expected to choose the most cost-effective compensation adjustment method," the department said. For some companies, the financial impact could be "near zero," it said.

Employers' options include:

  • Adhering to a 40-hour work week.
  • Raising workers' salaries to a new $22,100 annual threshold, making them ineligible for overtime pay.
    If employers raise a worker's salary "it means they're getting a raise — that's not a way around overtime," Frank said. The current threshold is $8,060 per year.
  • Making a "payroll adjustment" that results "in virtually no, or only a minimal increase in labor costs," the department said. Workers' annual pay would be converted to an hourly rate and cut, with overtime added in to equal the former salary.

Essentially, employees would be working more hours for the same pay.

The department does not view the "payroll adjustment" option as a pay cut. Rather, it allows the employer to "maintain the pay at the current level" with the new overtime requirements, said the Labor Department's Wage and Hour Division administrator, Tammy McCutchen, an architect of the plan.

Labor unions criticized the employer options.

Mark Wilson, a lawyer for the Communications Workers of America who specializes in overtime issues, said the Bush administration was protecting the interests of employers at the expense of workers.

"This plan speaks volumes about the real motives of this so-called family-friendly administration," Wilson said.

He says cutting workers' pay to avoid overtime is illegal, based on a 1945 Supreme Court ruling and a 1986 memo by the Labor Department under President Reagan.

 
But McCutchen disagreed. If changes were made week to week to avoid overtime, they would be illegal. A one-time change is not, she said.

"We had a lot of lawyers look at this rule. We would not have put that in there if we thought it was illegal," she said.

"Unless you have a contract, there is no legal rule ... prohibiting an employer from either raising your salary or cutting your salary," she said, adding, "We do not anticipate employers will cut people's pay."

The final plan does not require approval from Congress. That hasn't stopped Democrats and some Republicans from trying to block the rule, thus far unsuccessfully, out of fear that millions of workers would become ineligible for overtime.

Department officials say about 644,000 higher-paid workers would lose their overtime eligibility. But the proposal says 1.5 million to 2.7 million workers "will be more readily identified as exempt" from overtime requirements. Labor unions claim the figure is about 8 million.

The Labor Department is aware of lawmakers' concerns has read tens of thousands of comments about the proposal, McCutchen said.

"We understand what the public concerns are and we're going to be doing our best to address them," she said. "It's important to allow us to finish that process so we can back up our words with some good-faith action."

 

for more details,

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3882629/ns/business-us_business/t/us-offers-tips-avoiding-overtime-pay/

No. Subject Author Date Views
72 California Overtime Violations FAQ - I think my employer will retaliate against me if I file a wage claim for unpaid overtime. What can I do? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 663
71 California Overtime Violations FAQ - Can I file an overtime complaint against my current employer? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 734
70 California Overtime Violations FAQ - How much will a California Labor Law Attorney Cost? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 664
69 California Overtime Violations FAQ - How long does it take to get an Overtime Court Case? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 660
68 California Overtime Violations FAQ - Why do I need an attorney when I can just file an overtime claim with The California Labor Commission? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 664
67 California Overtime Violations FAQ - What can I do if my employer doens't pay me my overtime wages? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 734
66 California Overtime Violations FAQ - Does travel time count as overtime? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 710
65 California Overtime Violations FAQ - I'm a truck driver. Does that mean I an exempt? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 705
64 California Overtime Violations FAQ - I supervise 2 people. Does that mean I fit into the Executive Exemption? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 695
63 California Overtime Violations FAQ - I work part time and am paid a monthly salary. Does that exclude me from overtime? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 785
62 California Overtime Violations FAQ - signed up a statement as exempt and supervisor told no overtime. Is that right? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 822
61 California Overtime Violations FAQ - I don't supervise anyone. How can I determine whether I have been misclassified as exempt? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 657
60 California Overtime Violations FAQ - what does exemption or being exempt mean? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 738
59 California Overtime Violations FAQ - how long does it take to get paid overtime? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 640
58 California Overtime Violations FAQ - Can my employer require me to work overtime? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 788
57 California Overtime Violations FAQ - what if work overtime without permission? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 689
56 California Overtime Violations FAQ - Alternate Work Week? HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 658
55 California Overtime Violations FAQ - What is considered a "work week?" HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 620
54 California Overtime Violations FAQ - California Overtime Violations FAQ HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 675
» U.S. offers tips on avoiding overtime pay HR-Consultant 2012.07.07 639